further thoughts on the book
Mar. 17th, 2009 11:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I regret having read the book I mentioned last post. The whole thing is a rather remarkable anti-technology screed, especially surprising in light of the pro-technology slant of the author's other books. I find the political machinations of the characters unlikely, the economical theories bizarre, and the science, in many places, laughable. The main character, as I said before, was a messianic figure who produced profound changes in a galactic empire, yet people were doubting he even existed in just a couple of centuries. While that sort of forgetfulness is unlikely in a literate and bureaucratic society, in this case it is made understandable through an even less believable idea. Within just a generation or two of easy abundance being provided, the society basically reverted to agrarian with only very rare individuals caring about any technology beyond pre-industrial levels. Oh, and don't get me started on the fact that it took the main character more than a century to acquire any real personal enemies, despite being a highly abrasive individual; all opposition to him before that was man vs. environment or man vs. bureaucracy. Did I forget to mention that he was immortal?
Honestly, the difference in both quality and content between this trilogy and the rest of the author's work is so great that I have to question whether they are really by the same individual.
Honestly, the difference in both quality and content between this trilogy and the rest of the author's work is so great that I have to question whether they are really by the same individual.